|
|||||||||
|
User Details - Dan Popp
Name: |
Dan Popp | |
Details: |
||
Location: |
||
HiFi: |
||
Email: |
||
Web: |
||
Posts: |
531 |
Reviews |
Found: 21 show all |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
July 31, 2008
|
|
Peter, It would be your job only if you had insisted that such evidence existed. In fact. ... more | |
July 31, 2008
|
|
Peter, Your position seems to be that because anyone can provide some sort of "data" (real or manufactured) that poses as "evidence," therefore it is not important that purveyors provide evidence. My view is the opposite: since it is so easy to provide some nugget of babble that may fool the gullible, a snake oiler providing nothing at all is a ... more | |
July 31, 2008
|
|
What I read (in your post #82) was an assertion that empirical evidence on the benefits of SHM-CD has been provided by the "purveyors". This you called a "fact." To make such a pronouncement, you would have to have access to the alleged documentation. You must have seen it, to know certainly that it exists. Yet you are apparently unable to provide ... more | |
July 31, 2008
|
|
Peter, When SACD was introduced to the masses, those of us in the industry had already been aware of the technology for years. We first heard of it as "one-bit" or "Delta-Sigma" digital recording. Then we got reviews in major industry magazines of recordings captured with "DSD." There were even discussions on the pro forums of how one might edit ... more | |
July 30, 2008
|
|
Oh, for heaven's sake. A website in Japanese? No published paper, just "ask for details"? Again you have the matter upside-down. If this were a serious new audio technology, the company would want the industry, and its potential customers, to KNOW HOW IT WORKED. It would not be up to the snake-oil-buyer to "ask for details." Geez, you didn't even ... more |
|