|
|||||||||
|
User Details - Hotso
Name: |
Philip | |
Details: |
Recording Engineer | |
Location: |
Ireland | |
HiFi: |
||
Email: |
thehead@indigo.ie | |
Web: |
||
Posts: |
6 |
Reviews |
Found: 0 |
March 19, 2004
|
|
Anyone?? I was sure someone would know!! Hotso ... more | |
February 26, 2004
|
|
Hi All, Anyone know what format the Michael Jackson "Thriller" was originally recorded in? It was 1983 or thereabouts but it could have been digital. 3M or Sony or even Mitsubishi......someone out there knows! Hotso ... more | |
November 19, 2003
|
|
Hi Dan, I use Pro Tools HD for recording and like you, use 88.2k. 24 bit for nearly all work. You're right in the conversion to 44.1 is nice and easy. It's a while since I produced a master on 1/2 inch Studer running at 30ips (non Dolby) or 15 ips (Dolby SR) ! But if we are to take in account SACD as the finished product what do you think we ... more | |
November 18, 2003
|
|
Thanks for that Zeus, I understood that dithering or otherwise adding noise, didn't actually increase the resolution but just made it sound more 'natural'. Low level noise added to the signal hides the quantisation noise in the lower level signals. For example, the end of fades, quiet intro's etc. As for HDCD, I'm still waiting an explanation of ... more | |
November 17, 2003
|
|
Just thought I would begin a dialogue about the source of SACD. I presume that material recorded in the last 20 years is in the main 16 bit 44.1khz in it's multi-track form. However you mix this, the resolution is still 16 bit 44.1 !! So, record companies may very well release material that says "remixed for SACD" or similar, but in reality, they ... more |
|