|
|
February 5, 2012
|
I think Analoque's review nailed it for me.
This is what I wrote on another forum yesterday in regards to the sound quality of the SACD layer. This has long been my favorite Floyd album.
Two channel only
I just received the SACD a few days ago and played it at several volumes about five times. My ... more |
|
|
|
October 27, 2011
|
I have enjoyed this album for decades and have listened to it on many formats. My favorite digital (I'm 100 digital myself but sorry guys, the mofi vinyl is stunning) has been the original AM+ series. Last night I compared the two versions.
The difference was pretty obvious.The sacd had more ... more |
|
|
|
May 17, 2011
|
I'm surprised by the conficting reviews of this disc. I have to disagree with the review that gave it poor ratings in both music and sonics. Considering the talent on this disc, I don't understand how it could be but perhaps Monk for some is an aquired taste or perhaps we are not listening to the ... more |
|
|
|
May 15, 2011
|
WOW!
This is an excellent sounding SACD that contains some standout system demo tracks.I expect that a sampler from this 'audiophile label' would sound good and it does shine here. The wide soundstage and wonderful holographic image make this a sonic delight. If you have the system, your speakers ... more |
|
|
|
May 14, 2011
|
The first time I experienced this album was a few years ago on an outstanding system, with an all out analog front end. It was something that I never forgot. I own a nice original redbook but have never been able to capture the magic of the first time I heard it.
A couple of weeks ago I had the ... more |
|