Thread: sa-cd.net dead?

Posts: 15
Page: 1 2 next

Post by chromal February 13, 2009 (1 of 15)
Seriously, what's up with not updating the news section in three years?

Post by The Seventh Taylor February 13, 2009 (2 of 15)
Seriously, have you looked at the release pages and the forum?

Post by zeus February 13, 2009 (3 of 15)
chromal said:

Seriously, what's up with not updating the news section in three years?

No news is good news ...

http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/45/messages/374.html

Post by chromal February 14, 2009 (4 of 15)
The Seventh Taylor said:

Seriously, have you looked at the release pages and the forum?

Yes. What's up with the news?

Post by rammiepie February 14, 2009 (5 of 15)
chromal said:

Yes. What's up with the news?

As the Seventh Taylor posted, the NEWS is the new releases which Zeus posts as they become available and the FORUM which, if you read it, lists new players, new receivers which are SACD friendly and many OT (off topic) tidbits which make life interesting.....The FORUM thus is the NEWS 24/7 or the CNN of all things SACD (which means that ZEUS is Anderson Cooper 360).

Post by AELK February 14, 2009 (6 of 15)
chromal said:
Yes. What's up with the news?

Dear Chromal,
Maybe the news has to be paid to appear on this site and because the SACD war against regular CD users and BluRay users, has not been advertisers to invest in SACD advert.
You happy now ?

Post by StyleAndEntertainmen February 14, 2009 (7 of 15)
I'm with Chromal that it's very odd to see something called "news" have no updates in years. And there have been many new titles and players released since 20007 which used to be tracked in the news. Not a big deal, I wouldn't want maintain it or pay for it either.

Perhaps a simple title change to "History," "News Archive," or just plain "Chromal," would improve perceptions.

Styln

Post by AELK February 14, 2009 (8 of 15)
StyleAndEntertainmen said:
Not a big deal, I wouldn't want maintain it or pay for it either.

Someone has to pay for us users, have free access to a wonderful site like this. Zeus has to eat and pay accounts as everybody. Or do you prefer the users have to pay to use WWW.SA-CD.NET ?

Post by StyleAndEntertainmen February 14, 2009 (9 of 15)
AELK, you're repeating yourself and I am agreeing with you.

I gave a no cost option. Any opinion on that?

Styln

Post by AELK February 14, 2009 (10 of 15)
StyleAndEntertainmen said:
AELK, you're repeating yourself and I am agreeing with you.
I gave a no cost option. Any opinion on that?
Styln

OH, I do not see you agree with me, sorry.
Alan
P.S. : About the name change, I think the today name ' NEWS ' is OK. Maybe ZEUS do not have time to update this section etc...

Page: 1 2 next

Closed